A small feifdom? Deimachos and Megasthenes. Strabo. Amar had led one part of army. Flooding river behind. And about who lost to whom, Im still not convinced. Thats why people came to them like they come to us now. They are all the same. Absolutely Rubbish! Poruss forces stationed on the west bank of the Hydaspes initially shadowed each movement of the enemy on the opposite bank, but after a while they stopped. The momentum then turned in Alexanders favor. And Magadha had a very good geographical advantage as well. With the exception of nobles mounted on elephants or chariots, all of the Pauravan warriors deliberately chose not to wear armor. After he was defeated by Alexander, in a famous meeting with Porus - who had suffered many arrow wounds in the battle and had lost his sons, who all chose death in battle rather than surrender - Alexander reportedly asked him, "how he should treat him". Instead, the lie could only have originated with Alexander himself. Porus - Livius Even if it is not flooding, its ferocious. . The forces of Alexander and Porus fought on the banks of river - Toppr Ive had people who have seen me in person interpret me as a woman, since Im very small for an adult man, I have long curly hair, my face looks a bit feminine, and I have a squeaky voice. First of all, it is perplexing to me why people care so much about whether or not one ruler of a small kingdom in northwest India won a single battle 2,345 years ago. Western historians themselves on record say it. This is because of the way many victories are interpreted and defeats defined. Did Alexander successfully defeat Porus/Paurava at the Battle of Hydaspes? Hint: The Battle of Hydaspes was fought between Alexander the Great and Porus on the banks of the Hydaspes River. Because some historic accounts do state that he was wounded badly enough in these battles and that wound eventually led to his death. In any case, the dispute about Battle of Jhelum does not say that with this defeat Greeks were routed and went running back to Greece with their tails between their legs. Even this softer version of the story, though, does not hold up to scrutiny. The mercenaries ultimately surrendered when their commander was killed by a Macedonian arrow. They dont knew the meaning of development and science. Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), My Exciting Adventure in Greece, Part 2 (June 20th, 2023), My Exciting Adventure in Greece, Part 1 (June 13th, 2023). Even today Pakistan has to use helicopters to save citizens. Unlike the northern tribes that had just been conquered by Alexander, Porus could not use the mountains or a complex of fortified cities to slow down the advance of the invaders, for his kingdom was located on the plains of Punjab. View all posts by Spencer McDaniel. 9 million Vedic books were burnt by an Islamic conquerer n Nalanda University in 600 AD. But the Macedonian cavalry had by then swung behind Poruss army. What we can all understand is that basically alexander the greek shat himself when he saw the massive punjab army and war elephants king purava (porus) had amassed. That is absurd. As regards that influence of Greeks in North-Western India of the day, such influence occurs even if one country does not defeat the other. Alex didnt betray ambhi. To keep Porus unaware of his crossing, Alexander left General Craterus in the camp opposite Poruss position. Darius intended to raise a new army in the satrapies of Central Asia and undertake an offensive against Alexander. Porus, at least, came the closest to defeating Alexander out of anyone. Their officers shouted for them to hold their ground to no avail. This is not the kind of portrayal we would expect Greek writers to give us if Alexander had actually been defeated by Porus. Who knows. Alexander was referred to as "great" by early historians just as several other conquerors and prominent rulers have been called across empires and ages. You have written all your sources are greek historians who obviously have bias towards their golden boy alexander. Mark Twain Vanguard of Elephants on the Hydaspes River - Warfare History Network But Poruss elephants were not facing cavalry but rather a compact mass of heavy infantry. The traitors put Darius in golden chains, hoping that by giving their king to Alexander they could obtain some political advantage. Alexander showed great magnanimity toward the captured Sogdians. It was Amar who shot Alex not Porus. Do we say that Albert Einstein was indian?????? After stumbling upon the comments section of a video on the death of Alexander I saw tens of dozens of Indians all claiming the same thing: that Alexander was soundly defeated by Porus in the Battle of the Hydaspes and that the wounds he received in the battle were responsible for his death. Who defeated Alexander the Great? - TimesMojo The Wagner Mutiny Foreshadows a Russian Defeat Would you stay somewhere for 2 months for comfort? Because of their preparations, the Assakenoi were confident that they could defeat the invaders. Quaero Sophisma: Alexander the Defeated - Blogger Thats why, the historians said that, Porus lost using stupid reasons. Battle of Hydaspes. What happened? : r/IndiaSpeaks - Reddit We would expect to find some sources claiming Alexander totally won, other sources claiming Porus won but Alexander fought valiantly, and other sources claiming that the accounts of the battle are contradictory. Bessus decided to organize a conspiracy against King Darius, with the other satraps of the Central Asian provinces. If Alexander were really defeated by Porus, it does not make much sense why Greek writers looking to glorify Alexander would be so keen to emphasize Poruss own courage and nobility. Furthermore, King Porus was still alive at the time when Alexander was minting his victory coins. I am concluding that Alexander won the battle because that is where the historical evidence leads me. Once the Macedonian army arrived at the Indus, Alexander ordered his troops to build a bridge as quickly as possible. Why did king of Taxila surrender to Alex? The army raised by Porus and deployed against Alexander included 200 elephants, 420 six-man chariots, 6,000 cavalrymen, and 30,000 infantrymen, according to the Greek historian Arrian. We cant just put a conclusion. Somehow, all the descriptions of what happened on the banks of Jhelum by the Greek Historians can also be based upon the God-Kings defeat not being correctly reported. As he did at Hydaspes, Alexander showed that he could adapt and outfight any army no matter how different it was from his own. The Conquests of Alexander the Great (334 bce-323 bce) He says the two armies were separated by the river Hydaspes, o. I really find it very confusing as whom to believe. Quora - A place to share knowledge and better understand the world Alexander therefore appointed Porus as satrap of his own kingdom and the lands to the southeast as well. They were what we are now the Americans of the world. It was the Library which was important. Many others in the Persian army fled to Babylon, which Alexander later seized. These mounted warriors of Central Asia used guerrilla tactics against the Macedonians, relying on their mastery of horsemanship and archery to attack the invading forces from a distance. 2. Are you jealous????? Did Alexander conquer world? Brother of Porus. The fact that none of the Greek historians could have made Alexanders victory up on their own is also confirmed by the fact that Alexander himself issued a series of coins commemorating his victory over Porus. Bessus immediately proclaimed himself king of Persia, adopting the name of Artaxerxes V. In many ways, his self-proclaimed ascension was logical since the Satrap of Bactria was traditionally the Persian noble next in the line of succession to the Persian throne. The Pauravan infantry phalanxes, which were not as well trained or strong as the Macedonian phalanx, were placed not only behind the elephants but also between them. Contrary to what you say here, Alexander the Great did not, in fact, for the most part, slaughter the local persian [sic] population or Iran. Actually all he said in not right and Alexander not like you love to made ruthless killer he didnt like kill and he lift porus alive not for mercy or fear but for political reason. Before Alexanders arrival, India had only received small Persian expeditions. A blatant victory does not explain that route but a truce or pyrrhic victory might . One of these, the ruler of Taxila named Ambhi, readily accepted Alexanders request. Other fortified positions had to be assaulted and conquered by his forces, including the difficult siege operations against Aornos. In towers atop the elephants backs, expert archers fired down on the Greek spearmen. Is it plausible to believe Porus beat Alexander? - Quora Alexanders great triumph on the Hydaspes would be his last battle. Hydaspes. The simplest and most logical conclusion here is that Alexander really won, just as all the historical sources record. The Indian concept of History was always cyclical and this has now found favour with many scholars since many events appear to mirror what had happened in the past. The Macedonians, who had retained a perfect order during their withdrawal, redeployed on the high ground. Did Alexander the Great win or lose against Porus (before the eventual Moreover, Alexanders MO right before Hydaspes was to call for a truce with the adversary e.g. which made him look magnanimous. Their superiority was due to the excellence of their main weapon. The Assakenoi boosted their army with the addition of 7,000 elite mercenaries from the Indian territories east of the Indus River. But these historians do concede that the battle with Porus was the toughest that Alexander faced. That triumph, though, should not obscure the fact that the Belarusian ruler is nothing more than a . The most important of the Indian rulers who opposed Alexander was Porus, the ruler of the powerful Kingdom of Pauravas. I can ask a set of questions which, if answered based upon available evidence, can point in the right direction: 2 thousand years ago, how will he transport such a huge army, horses, weaponries. Around 200,000 Infantry Instead, all of our surviving sources agree that Alexander won the Battle of the Hydaspes. Not sure how much you have traveled India or Pakistan and know how this land, so if you want to know about the richness of this land, you need to travel not by air only in the cities, travel in interior parts of the country, you will know how rich and advanced this land was. They had marched halfway across the known world and they were no doubt exhausted and homesick. If there was good reason to question Alexanders victory, then I would question it, but, as matters stand, I am not aware of any good evidence to indicate that Alexander lost. After crossing the River Oxus, which marks the modern border between Afghanistan and Tajikistan, the Bactrian mounted troops deserted and abandoned Bessus, who was seized by several of his chieftains and handed over to the pursuing Macedonians. Porus did not rule India. This battle was Alexander's 4th and last campaign of conquest in Asia. He fought so hard that even his enemy was impressed and he was not only permitted to govern his former kingdom as a satrap, but the lands to the southwest as well. People got to accept it. If Alexander had really lost the battle, then the tens of thousands of people who survived the battle would have all known that he was lying when he claimed victory over Porus. next; while Onesikritos and Nearchos, Science , almost every parts of mathematics , astronomy, astrology, literature, politics etc. 1. Two millennia later, British historians latched on to Alexander legend and described the campaign as great western triumph. So good luck with this PhD. Ambi supported Alexander and Alexander gave Ambis lands to Porus. ABOVE: Map from Wikimedia Commons showing Alexanders conquests in Asia. by Angel . Military Heritage; . Did King Porus Defeat Alexander the Great? - Tales of Times Forgotten The list goes on and India had the prime geography and structure to be a world power for 3 millennia. The story as it has been passed down to us emphasizes Poruss courage and nobility. Everyone came? If some historians say, ZERO was invented by some western person, I am sure you will ask everyone to believe as you do not trust any of the Indian Historians. One simple point to erupt controversy on this topic is the silver coin minted, the image depict whos the winner, Why would any kingdom accept such coins where the king is projected as a defeated, more over when Alexander was not even in authority nor was the king? Also, remember Persians had clearly told Alexander, never cross over to subcontinent. It is exceedingly difficult to persuade the public that you won a battle that you really lost if there are tens of thousands of people who know full well that you really lost the battle. As I know Porus had lost the battle, but at the same time Alexander had to retreat due to various reasons which are well debatable and he could not conquer this land for which he was traveling to. The actual site of the Sogdian Rock is still debated to this day, but most archaeologists believe it was located near Samarkand. What does it show ? These Ultra-Nationalists and Jingoists wont learn, theyre too dumb and stubborn to accept defeat. Clearly, Alexander himself claimed that he had won. Alexander is recognised as first invader in Bharatvarsha. There are serious logistical problems, though, with the idea of Alexander claiming victory when he really lost. Porus has more than just 120 mentioned in history. Youd agree by all the cited accounts it appears a very pyrrhic victory for Alexander. He was strong, tall, and courageous. Sure, he lost, but he was going up against Alexander the Great, whom no one else ever managed to defeat. Alexander had great engineering skills, and he had surmounted all manner of challenges up to that point. These men had gained a lot of experience in rock climbing from the previous sieges of the Central Asian campaign and were quite confident in the positive outcome of the delicate mission. Meanwhile, Alexanders Asiatic horsemen harried the elephants from the flank, closely cooperating with the specially trained light infantry that stabbed the ele- phants legs. But our Bharatvarsh is a land of braves since ancient times. We need logic, that would be primary. Alexander soon had a full-scale mutiny on his hands, which forced him to address his armys internal problems. According to all surviving ancient historical sources, King Alexandros III of Makedonia (most commonly known in English as "Alexander the Great") defeated King Porus (whose name is conjectured to have been Puru in his native tongue) of the Indian kingdom of Paurava in the Battle of the Hydaspes in May 326 BC. If, as Indian and Pakistani nationalists claim, he really won the Battle of the Hydaspes and was still ruling his kingdom at this time, he presumably would have been pretty annoyed by Alexander claiming that he had won. Alex was defeated way badly. 12. Thus have no merit or credit. But his soldiers were exhausted from the extended campaigns and the numerous hardships they had endured. out a few words (of truth). 7. Western historians of these days are sure that, Alex did not win the battle. What I know is this : Hinduism has 1 billion verses condensed into 4 lakhs verse against 6000 verses of Christianity. Each elephant or chariot received a certain number of infantrymen and cavalrymen. You will get all proof yourself. Again roman hisorians hides another important fact. Poruss plans would been perfect in an Indian war, but he was facing a different opponent. Alexander led his heavy cavalry in a spirited charge that drove back his adversaries. Alexander conquered Poruss kingdom and continued further into India. Those nationalists etc. Though Alex crossed Jhelum. Porus replied that he wished to be treated the way Alexander would have wanted Porus to have treated him. Poisonous serpents, too many wild elephants. Use your common sense and pen and paper maam. The fact that you cant even tell the difference between Greeks and Romans does not do much to help your credibility. If Alexander did Defeat Puru , WHY did he not advance deeper into India? All our surviving historical sources agree that Alexander won the Battle of the Hydaspes. Did Alexander the Great ever lose? Prominent examples are the Roman emperor Constantine; the Persians Cyrus and Darius; Herod, king of Judea; and in more modern times, Catherine and Peter of Russia, and Frederick of Prussia. I graduated with high distinction from Indiana University Bloomington in May 2022 with a BA in history and classical studies (Ancient Greek and Latin languages), with departmental honors in history. The Greek foot soldiers recoiled with shock and backpedaled toward the ferry landing on the Hydaspes River. If Alex had lost then why didnt accounts by his generals (Ptolemaios I Soter, Nearchus etc) use Alexs defeat as propoganda to make Alex look weak and make themselves look superior. Chanakya Started Playing With The Minds Of Enemies 2.4. This would entail a scorched earth strategy designed to weaken the Greeks through attrition. The last of the Persian kings was tortured and then executed in punishment for dethroning the legitimate monarch Darius. June 24, 2023 at 6:35 a.m. EDT. These sources, in turn, rely on earlier sources that have since been lost. Oh just to add, Plutarch says: The combat with Porus took the edge off the Macedonians Pyrrhic victory? Kings and nobles, fighting on elephants or chariots, were armed with javelins or spears and protected by brass helmets and scale armor. You answer me, how could Alex cross a ferocious flooding river with 2k soldiers, horses, armaments and supplies. An entire genre of Greco-Buddhist art came to flourish in the region. They say that, Alex had no chance of winning the battle. It took place on the banks of the Hydaspes River in Punjab, as part of Alexander's Indian campaign. Alexander had never been beaten in combat in a decade of conquest, but on this spring day in 326 BC he seemed closer to defeat than ever. Alexanders army was less Macedonian than ever before. PORUS: THE KING WHO STOPPED ALEXANDER | Salute He had gradually transformed his army into a multinational force that retained its core of elite Macedonian phalanx and heavy cavalry. The death of Darius had not led to an end of the war, which now continued between Alexander and Bessus. Now, here is more-or-less the revised history that some Indian and Pakistani nationalists are promoting: Alexander not only lost to King Porus in the Battle of the Hydaspes, but he was utterly whupped and forced to flee into retreat and leave India forever.
alexander was defeated by poruswhitman college deposit
A small feifdom? Deimachos and Megasthenes. Strabo. Amar had led one part of army. Flooding river behind. And about who lost to whom, Im still not convinced. Thats why people came to them like they come to us now. They are all the same. Absolutely Rubbish! Poruss forces stationed on the west bank of the Hydaspes initially shadowed each movement of the enemy on the opposite bank, but after a while they stopped. The momentum then turned in Alexanders favor. And Magadha had a very good geographical advantage as well. With the exception of nobles mounted on elephants or chariots, all of the Pauravan warriors deliberately chose not to wear armor. After he was defeated by Alexander, in a famous meeting with Porus - who had suffered many arrow wounds in the battle and had lost his sons, who all chose death in battle rather than surrender - Alexander reportedly asked him, "how he should treat him". Instead, the lie could only have originated with Alexander himself. Porus - Livius Even if it is not flooding, its ferocious. . The forces of Alexander and Porus fought on the banks of river - Toppr Ive had people who have seen me in person interpret me as a woman, since Im very small for an adult man, I have long curly hair, my face looks a bit feminine, and I have a squeaky voice. First of all, it is perplexing to me why people care so much about whether or not one ruler of a small kingdom in northwest India won a single battle 2,345 years ago. Western historians themselves on record say it. This is because of the way many victories are interpreted and defeats defined. Did Alexander successfully defeat Porus/Paurava at the Battle of Hydaspes? Hint: The Battle of Hydaspes was fought between Alexander the Great and Porus on the banks of the Hydaspes River. Because some historic accounts do state that he was wounded badly enough in these battles and that wound eventually led to his death. In any case, the dispute about Battle of Jhelum does not say that with this defeat Greeks were routed and went running back to Greece with their tails between their legs. Even this softer version of the story, though, does not hold up to scrutiny. The mercenaries ultimately surrendered when their commander was killed by a Macedonian arrow. They dont knew the meaning of development and science. Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), My Exciting Adventure in Greece, Part 2 (June 20th, 2023), My Exciting Adventure in Greece, Part 1 (June 13th, 2023). Even today Pakistan has to use helicopters to save citizens. Unlike the northern tribes that had just been conquered by Alexander, Porus could not use the mountains or a complex of fortified cities to slow down the advance of the invaders, for his kingdom was located on the plains of Punjab. View all posts by Spencer McDaniel. 9 million Vedic books were burnt by an Islamic conquerer n Nalanda University in 600 AD. But the Macedonian cavalry had by then swung behind Poruss army. What we can all understand is that basically alexander the greek shat himself when he saw the massive punjab army and war elephants king purava (porus) had amassed. That is absurd. As regards that influence of Greeks in North-Western India of the day, such influence occurs even if one country does not defeat the other. Alex didnt betray ambhi. To keep Porus unaware of his crossing, Alexander left General Craterus in the camp opposite Poruss position. Darius intended to raise a new army in the satrapies of Central Asia and undertake an offensive against Alexander. Porus, at least, came the closest to defeating Alexander out of anyone. Their officers shouted for them to hold their ground to no avail. This is not the kind of portrayal we would expect Greek writers to give us if Alexander had actually been defeated by Porus. Who knows. Alexander was referred to as "great" by early historians just as several other conquerors and prominent rulers have been called across empires and ages. You have written all your sources are greek historians who obviously have bias towards their golden boy alexander. Mark Twain Vanguard of Elephants on the Hydaspes River - Warfare History Network But Poruss elephants were not facing cavalry but rather a compact mass of heavy infantry. The traitors put Darius in golden chains, hoping that by giving their king to Alexander they could obtain some political advantage. Alexander showed great magnanimity toward the captured Sogdians. It was Amar who shot Alex not Porus. Do we say that Albert Einstein was indian?????? After stumbling upon the comments section of a video on the death of Alexander I saw tens of dozens of Indians all claiming the same thing: that Alexander was soundly defeated by Porus in the Battle of the Hydaspes and that the wounds he received in the battle were responsible for his death. Who defeated Alexander the Great? - TimesMojo The Wagner Mutiny Foreshadows a Russian Defeat Would you stay somewhere for 2 months for comfort? Because of their preparations, the Assakenoi were confident that they could defeat the invaders. Quaero Sophisma: Alexander the Defeated - Blogger Thats why, the historians said that, Porus lost using stupid reasons. Battle of Hydaspes. What happened? : r/IndiaSpeaks - Reddit We would expect to find some sources claiming Alexander totally won, other sources claiming Porus won but Alexander fought valiantly, and other sources claiming that the accounts of the battle are contradictory. Bessus decided to organize a conspiracy against King Darius, with the other satraps of the Central Asian provinces. If Alexander were really defeated by Porus, it does not make much sense why Greek writers looking to glorify Alexander would be so keen to emphasize Poruss own courage and nobility. Furthermore, King Porus was still alive at the time when Alexander was minting his victory coins. I am concluding that Alexander won the battle because that is where the historical evidence leads me. Once the Macedonian army arrived at the Indus, Alexander ordered his troops to build a bridge as quickly as possible. Why did king of Taxila surrender to Alex? The army raised by Porus and deployed against Alexander included 200 elephants, 420 six-man chariots, 6,000 cavalrymen, and 30,000 infantrymen, according to the Greek historian Arrian. We cant just put a conclusion. Somehow, all the descriptions of what happened on the banks of Jhelum by the Greek Historians can also be based upon the God-Kings defeat not being correctly reported. As he did at Hydaspes, Alexander showed that he could adapt and outfight any army no matter how different it was from his own. The Conquests of Alexander the Great (334 bce-323 bce) He says the two armies were separated by the river Hydaspes, o. I really find it very confusing as whom to believe. Quora - A place to share knowledge and better understand the world Alexander therefore appointed Porus as satrap of his own kingdom and the lands to the southeast as well. They were what we are now the Americans of the world. It was the Library which was important. Many others in the Persian army fled to Babylon, which Alexander later seized. These mounted warriors of Central Asia used guerrilla tactics against the Macedonians, relying on their mastery of horsemanship and archery to attack the invading forces from a distance. 2. Are you jealous????? Did Alexander conquer world? Brother of Porus. The fact that none of the Greek historians could have made Alexanders victory up on their own is also confirmed by the fact that Alexander himself issued a series of coins commemorating his victory over Porus. Bessus immediately proclaimed himself king of Persia, adopting the name of Artaxerxes V. In many ways, his self-proclaimed ascension was logical since the Satrap of Bactria was traditionally the Persian noble next in the line of succession to the Persian throne. The Pauravan infantry phalanxes, which were not as well trained or strong as the Macedonian phalanx, were placed not only behind the elephants but also between them. Contrary to what you say here, Alexander the Great did not, in fact, for the most part, slaughter the local persian [sic] population or Iran. Actually all he said in not right and Alexander not like you love to made ruthless killer he didnt like kill and he lift porus alive not for mercy or fear but for political reason. Before Alexanders arrival, India had only received small Persian expeditions. A blatant victory does not explain that route but a truce or pyrrhic victory might . One of these, the ruler of Taxila named Ambhi, readily accepted Alexanders request. Other fortified positions had to be assaulted and conquered by his forces, including the difficult siege operations against Aornos. In towers atop the elephants backs, expert archers fired down on the Greek spearmen. Is it plausible to believe Porus beat Alexander? - Quora Alexanders great triumph on the Hydaspes would be his last battle. Hydaspes. The simplest and most logical conclusion here is that Alexander really won, just as all the historical sources record. The Indian concept of History was always cyclical and this has now found favour with many scholars since many events appear to mirror what had happened in the past. The Macedonians, who had retained a perfect order during their withdrawal, redeployed on the high ground. Did Alexander the Great win or lose against Porus (before the eventual Moreover, Alexanders MO right before Hydaspes was to call for a truce with the adversary e.g. which made him look magnanimous. Their superiority was due to the excellence of their main weapon. The Assakenoi boosted their army with the addition of 7,000 elite mercenaries from the Indian territories east of the Indus River. But these historians do concede that the battle with Porus was the toughest that Alexander faced. That triumph, though, should not obscure the fact that the Belarusian ruler is nothing more than a . The most important of the Indian rulers who opposed Alexander was Porus, the ruler of the powerful Kingdom of Pauravas. I can ask a set of questions which, if answered based upon available evidence, can point in the right direction: 2 thousand years ago, how will he transport such a huge army, horses, weaponries. Around 200,000 Infantry Instead, all of our surviving sources agree that Alexander won the Battle of the Hydaspes. Not sure how much you have traveled India or Pakistan and know how this land, so if you want to know about the richness of this land, you need to travel not by air only in the cities, travel in interior parts of the country, you will know how rich and advanced this land was. They had marched halfway across the known world and they were no doubt exhausted and homesick. If there was good reason to question Alexanders victory, then I would question it, but, as matters stand, I am not aware of any good evidence to indicate that Alexander lost. After crossing the River Oxus, which marks the modern border between Afghanistan and Tajikistan, the Bactrian mounted troops deserted and abandoned Bessus, who was seized by several of his chieftains and handed over to the pursuing Macedonians. Porus did not rule India. This battle was Alexander's 4th and last campaign of conquest in Asia. He fought so hard that even his enemy was impressed and he was not only permitted to govern his former kingdom as a satrap, but the lands to the southwest as well. People got to accept it. If Alexander had really lost the battle, then the tens of thousands of people who survived the battle would have all known that he was lying when he claimed victory over Porus. next; while Onesikritos and Nearchos, Science , almost every parts of mathematics , astronomy, astrology, literature, politics etc. 1. Two millennia later, British historians latched on to Alexander legend and described the campaign as great western triumph. So good luck with this PhD. Ambi supported Alexander and Alexander gave Ambis lands to Porus. ABOVE: Map from Wikimedia Commons showing Alexanders conquests in Asia. by Angel . Military Heritage; . Did King Porus Defeat Alexander the Great? - Tales of Times Forgotten The list goes on and India had the prime geography and structure to be a world power for 3 millennia. The story as it has been passed down to us emphasizes Poruss courage and nobility. Everyone came? If some historians say, ZERO was invented by some western person, I am sure you will ask everyone to believe as you do not trust any of the Indian Historians. One simple point to erupt controversy on this topic is the silver coin minted, the image depict whos the winner, Why would any kingdom accept such coins where the king is projected as a defeated, more over when Alexander was not even in authority nor was the king? Also, remember Persians had clearly told Alexander, never cross over to subcontinent. It is exceedingly difficult to persuade the public that you won a battle that you really lost if there are tens of thousands of people who know full well that you really lost the battle. As I know Porus had lost the battle, but at the same time Alexander had to retreat due to various reasons which are well debatable and he could not conquer this land for which he was traveling to. The actual site of the Sogdian Rock is still debated to this day, but most archaeologists believe it was located near Samarkand. What does it show ? These Ultra-Nationalists and Jingoists wont learn, theyre too dumb and stubborn to accept defeat. Clearly, Alexander himself claimed that he had won. Alexander is recognised as first invader in Bharatvarsha. There are serious logistical problems, though, with the idea of Alexander claiming victory when he really lost. Porus has more than just 120 mentioned in history. Youd agree by all the cited accounts it appears a very pyrrhic victory for Alexander. He was strong, tall, and courageous. Sure, he lost, but he was going up against Alexander the Great, whom no one else ever managed to defeat. Alexander had great engineering skills, and he had surmounted all manner of challenges up to that point. These men had gained a lot of experience in rock climbing from the previous sieges of the Central Asian campaign and were quite confident in the positive outcome of the delicate mission. Meanwhile, Alexanders Asiatic horsemen harried the elephants from the flank, closely cooperating with the specially trained light infantry that stabbed the ele- phants legs. But our Bharatvarsh is a land of braves since ancient times. We need logic, that would be primary. Alexander soon had a full-scale mutiny on his hands, which forced him to address his armys internal problems. According to all surviving ancient historical sources, King Alexandros III of Makedonia (most commonly known in English as "Alexander the Great") defeated King Porus (whose name is conjectured to have been Puru in his native tongue) of the Indian kingdom of Paurava in the Battle of the Hydaspes in May 326 BC. If, as Indian and Pakistani nationalists claim, he really won the Battle of the Hydaspes and was still ruling his kingdom at this time, he presumably would have been pretty annoyed by Alexander claiming that he had won. Alex was defeated way badly. 12. Thus have no merit or credit. But his soldiers were exhausted from the extended campaigns and the numerous hardships they had endured. out a few words (of truth). 7. Western historians of these days are sure that, Alex did not win the battle. What I know is this : Hinduism has 1 billion verses condensed into 4 lakhs verse against 6000 verses of Christianity. Each elephant or chariot received a certain number of infantrymen and cavalrymen. You will get all proof yourself. Again roman hisorians hides another important fact. Poruss plans would been perfect in an Indian war, but he was facing a different opponent. Alexander led his heavy cavalry in a spirited charge that drove back his adversaries. Alexander conquered Poruss kingdom and continued further into India. Those nationalists etc. Though Alex crossed Jhelum. Porus replied that he wished to be treated the way Alexander would have wanted Porus to have treated him. Poisonous serpents, too many wild elephants. Use your common sense and pen and paper maam. The fact that you cant even tell the difference between Greeks and Romans does not do much to help your credibility. If Alexander did Defeat Puru , WHY did he not advance deeper into India? All our surviving historical sources agree that Alexander won the Battle of the Hydaspes. Did Alexander the Great ever lose? Prominent examples are the Roman emperor Constantine; the Persians Cyrus and Darius; Herod, king of Judea; and in more modern times, Catherine and Peter of Russia, and Frederick of Prussia. I graduated with high distinction from Indiana University Bloomington in May 2022 with a BA in history and classical studies (Ancient Greek and Latin languages), with departmental honors in history. The Greek foot soldiers recoiled with shock and backpedaled toward the ferry landing on the Hydaspes River. If Alex had lost then why didnt accounts by his generals (Ptolemaios I Soter, Nearchus etc) use Alexs defeat as propoganda to make Alex look weak and make themselves look superior. Chanakya Started Playing With The Minds Of Enemies 2.4. This would entail a scorched earth strategy designed to weaken the Greeks through attrition. The last of the Persian kings was tortured and then executed in punishment for dethroning the legitimate monarch Darius. June 24, 2023 at 6:35 a.m. EDT. These sources, in turn, rely on earlier sources that have since been lost. Oh just to add, Plutarch says: The combat with Porus took the edge off the Macedonians Pyrrhic victory? Kings and nobles, fighting on elephants or chariots, were armed with javelins or spears and protected by brass helmets and scale armor. You answer me, how could Alex cross a ferocious flooding river with 2k soldiers, horses, armaments and supplies. An entire genre of Greco-Buddhist art came to flourish in the region. They say that, Alex had no chance of winning the battle. It took place on the banks of the Hydaspes River in Punjab, as part of Alexander's Indian campaign. Alexander had never been beaten in combat in a decade of conquest, but on this spring day in 326 BC he seemed closer to defeat than ever. Alexanders army was less Macedonian than ever before. PORUS: THE KING WHO STOPPED ALEXANDER | Salute He had gradually transformed his army into a multinational force that retained its core of elite Macedonian phalanx and heavy cavalry. The death of Darius had not led to an end of the war, which now continued between Alexander and Bessus. Now, here is more-or-less the revised history that some Indian and Pakistani nationalists are promoting: Alexander not only lost to King Porus in the Battle of the Hydaspes, but he was utterly whupped and forced to flee into retreat and leave India forever. Uchealth Fort Collins Radiology,
Articles A
